____

What do Glenn Beck and Paige Patterson have in common?  They are both delivering commencement addresses at Liberty University.  It is interesting how Glenn Beck has become to the darling of conservative evangelicals.

From Christianity Today,

Fox News commentator Glenn Beck will deliver the commencement address at Liberty University’s May 15 graduation.
“Beck is one of the few courageous voices in the national media standing up for the principles upon which this nation was founded,” Jerry Falwell Jr., chancellor of Liberty University, said in the school newspaper’s story.
The baccalaureate address will be delivered by Paige Patterson, president of the Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, whom Falwell called one of the “patriarchs of Christian higher education.”
“Both speakers continue Liberty’s long tradition of commencement speakers who are making a positive impact on society in all walks of life,” he said.

Share
Tagged with:
 

The 40th President Ronald Wilson Reagan

I am for health care reform.

It’s important for me to say that first before I get demonized as liking extremely high insurance premiums and outrageous co-pays. I think that there is a fundamental problem with the fact that children can’t get reasonable health insurance because they have a pre-existing condition without paying out the wazoo for deductibles. There are enough flaws to be talked about for days .

However, when it comes to the federal government I have always believed that less is more. That’s the Reagan in me. Show me something that the government does and I will show you how the private sector either does or can do it better. Now I don’t believe that the fed shouldn’t regulate some things, I’m not a libertarian. But as a rule, the more the government interferes, the more messy things are going to get. Point in case: Medicaid/Medicare and Social Security. Guess who’s paying into ‘em and probably will never benefit? (for those of you at home I’m pointing two thumbs towards myself)

Yet all these political talking points pale in comparison to the single most important issue that my blue dog counterpart and I both agree on. Abortion. Even with the President’s executive order, this bill is still not abortion neutral. Dean Burk of Boyce College consistently reminded us all via twitter that executive orders only last as long as the tenure and resolve of the sitting President. Scary thoughts when we think about the lives of the unborn. Quite frankly, I’m not comfortable with the resolve of a President who’s first executive order was to repeal the policy that his latest one is putting in place! And I don’t mean that as a cheap shot, but as the late Tim Russert used to say, “you’re entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.”

All that being said, this is not a political blog. But the latest legislation that will be signed off by the President tomorrow will have implications on our theology and our lives. I’ve recently been challenged by a friend of mine who is much smarter than me to at least think about the fact that sickness and suffering are realities in a post-Genesis 3 world. Should Christians be for measures that reduce these realities? And if our churches aren’t taking care of the sick and the dying who will? The government? And if so at what cost? I don’t think such measures should come at the cost of unborn lives. There are a lot of questions that evangelicals need to think through, which is the point of this blog. But such questions will not be answered in a day.

Links for further reading
Dr. Russell Moore on Do Not be Afraid
Dr. Denny Burk on Bart Stupak

Share

A Savior on Capitol Hill

Here’s a simple reminder for democrats, republicans, independents, green party members, and anyone I missed. This video was from back during the election, but I think the message still rings true today.

Share

Preident Obama and Vice-President Biden as Obama speaks to the U.S as he celebrates victory. (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP Photo)

Tonight, March 21, 2010, the House of Representatives passed their version of the health care bill. It now moves to the Senate and is one step away from reaching President Obama’s desk, where he will sign it into law. All house Republicans and many house Democrats have recently come out against the bill because of the high cost and the language of federally funded abortions. Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI.) originally led the fight for the Democrats against the bill, but tonight changed his vote in favor of the reform. The bill passed 219-212.

All of my friends who know me are aware that I am not a conservative Republican by any stretch of the imagination. I do not line up on a lot of issues like gun control, capital punishment and even many issues concerning health care. As someone who has a pre-existing back condition, and has had a hard time finding affordable insurance, I was for a long time in favor of a bill. In spite of all of this, I firmly believe that abortion is murder and am staunchly pro-life. As a “Blue Dog,” I am very disappointed in my contemporaries, including Stupak, a Michigan native. These issues are very important, but if there is one you do not budge on it is the issue of life.

There is much debate over how much this will all change, when it will really start to take effect, etc. The bottom line is, on the issue of character, and standing up for what you believe in, many failed tonight. This was by no means a victory for America, or even the Democratic party. I believe the elections, come November, will tell that story.

Let me make myself clear, I do not believe this is the end of America. I am not ready to leave the country, or do anything rash.  Fellow maverick, Chris Garner, said he was going to burn the constitution tonight because it is not void. While I do not share in Chris’ enthusiasm, I am disappointed. The Democratic party should be about freedom and fighting for the underdog. This is impossible when you won’t even let them take their first breath…

Share
Tagged with:
 

Jesus Loves Haiti

The death count is up to 50,000 after the devistating earthquake Haiti experienced on January 12, 2010. The disaster registered a 7.0 and the nation is in ruins. It is times like these that we as fellow human beings need to do what we can to help those in need. You would think that this would be the sentiment of all, but this is not true, in the wake of these horrific events there have been some who have made some hurtful, almost evil comments.

Evangelical leader Pat Robertson said, the earthquake in Haiti was God’s punishment for the Haitian slaves’ pact with the devil’ to win freedom from France. Echos of Falwell’s ignorant comments after September 11. Rush Limbaugh said he wouldn’t trust money donated to Haiti because of corruption and O’Rielly has made similar remarks. If relief for Haiti is going to be bipartisan, I want nothing to do with conservatism.

Russell Moore, on his Twitter, said, “Pat Robertson’s reported comments on Haiti are embarrassing, unhelpful, and counter-gospel. Jesus loves Haiti,” and I agree. The Gospel beckons us to care for the poor, feed the hungry and clothe the naked. Jesus says that when we do this for the least of these we are doing this for him. Whether it means to go to Haiti, donate money or simply pray, christians need to be called to action. In the end when Jesus says, I was hungry and you did not feed me, I was naked and you did not clothe me. And some will wonder when that opportunity was, brothers and sisters the time is NOW!

Share

On November 20, 2009 The Manhattan Declaration was release and there has been some buzz about this document. The actual title is – Manhattan Declaration: A Call of Christian Conscience. The document was penned by Robert George, Timothy George and Charles Colson and calls Orthodox, Catholic and Evangelical Christian to take a stand. The declaration speaks to abortion, marriage and religious liberty, and currently has 120582 signatures.

Dr. Albert Mohler

Dr. Albert Mohler

Download a copy of The Manhattan Declaration.

With that being said there are disagreements amongst evangelical leaders as to whether one should sign the document or not. Professors here at the seminary such as Dr. R. Albert Mohler Jr. and Dr. Chad Brand have signed and are encouraging others to do the same. On the other hand, leaders such as Dr. John MacArthur and Dr. Alistair Begg are saying the will not sign it. They claim the true remedy to these problems are the gospel and that is not clear enough in the declaration.

Dr. John MacArthur

Dr. John MacArthur

Dr. MacArthur’s article on not signing the declaration

Dr. Begg’s article on not signing the declaration

At this point I want to pose the question; what do you think? should we sign the Manhattan Declaration, or not? What is the maverick thing to do here? Men who, for the most part, agree on a number of issues are parting ways here.

Thoughts?

Share

I Choose Life: A Maverick Among Mavericks

As we launch this site, we speak about being mavericks. Well, I may be a maverick among mavericks on this one. I am a pro-life maverick. Surely one’s first thought is that all of the contributors to the site are pro-life. I am not merely speaking to abortion, which I am firmly against, but also capital punishment.

I do not stand in favor of capital punishment, I believe arguements for it planted in the mosaic law have been uprooted in Christ. Also, it contradicts the christian teaching of mercy and finally, I believe the passages used to defend capital punishment are misinterpreted.

To begin, the mosaic command of capital punishment was tied to Israel’s theocracy and is no longer applicable. The law of Christ is not death, it is love. We are required to love and serve our neighbors (Matt. 22:37-40; 5:31-46; 1 John 3:18; 4:12,20), and we arelfe required to love our enemies (Matt. 5:43-44). Revenge is also forbidden (Rom 12:17-19; 1 Peter 3:8-9).

The 2nd issue is that of christian mercy. Cain, Moses and David all murdered with intention, not accidentally, and mercy was extended. Also, in John 8:1-11, the woman who was caught in adultery, the law clearly called for her execution (Lev. 20:10; Duet. 22:21, 24). However, Jesus told her to go and sin no more. Even for those who hold that the law still applies in that aspect today must recognize the mercy there.

Finally, I would like to address 2 passages commonly used to defend capital punishment; Gen. 9 & Rom 13. Gen.9:6 is used to preach capital punishment, while verses 4-5 are thought to be of no importance anymore (the eating of rare meat & the execution of animals that kill humans). I would also like to suggest that Gen. 9 is not prescriptive but, predictive. If you take a life, you should expect yours will be taken also. The hebrew is indescisive on the issue. I would lastly like to suggest that the government “bearing the sword” in Romans 13 does not necessarily refer to capital punishment. The sword clearly refers to the state’s right to punish evil-doers but that does not warrent capital punishment. In the Roman Empire most crimes were not punishable by death.

I could go into much more detail and there are many other arguments that could be made, but for the sake of time I just wanted to put this on the table. I believe, even in a group of evangelical mavericks I may be a maverick on this one. Let me know what you’re thinking.

Share
Tagged with:
 

MLK, Jr. and the Purpose Driven Milk

obama-and-rick-warren1

Rick Warren and Barack Obama Embrace at Saddleback

You may wonder what all these things have in common, well as I’m sure all of you are aware of President Elect Barak H. Obama has asked Rick Warren to give the invocation at the inauguration on January 20, 2009.

This has upset not only the liberal, pro-gay community but also the far right. Liberals are upset that Obama would ask an anti-gay marriage bible thumping preacher to do the invocation and conservatives are upset that Warren has accepted an invitation to pray publically at an event for the President-Elect who is pro-choice. Dr. Mohler, on his blog stated he would not accept the invitation.

Whether this debate is silly or not you can decide. I personally feel there is nothing wrong with Warren accepting the invitation. I personally disagree with Obama on his abortion stance but may agree with him on many other issues.

Share
Tagged with:
 

Obama-Rama in London

Check out what Gerard Baker of The London Times has to say about Barack Obama.

Share
 

There is a lot of discussion on the cable news channels about the evangelical voting block.  The NY Times has an article Obama Courts Evangelicals.  CNN has an interview with Shane Claiborne on this as well.  Some pundits say that evangelicals will vote in the same numbers for McCain as Bush, but most disagree.  Many think that a significant number of evangelicals will stay at home or vote for Obama.  So why are evangelicals suddenly flirting with leaving the Republican establishment?  I would like to suggest a few reasons why this might be.

  1. The young evangelical community was born in the post Roe v. Wade decision.
  2. It is easier to vote “values” when one’s bank account is filled with cash.
  3. The politics of the moral majority is often tied with a pessimistic eschatology and therefore seems to always be support negative politics (i.e. against abortion, against gay marriage) rather than a progressive agenda for the poor or to end AIDS.
  4. There has not been significant policy change that excited the younger generation of evangelicals.
  5. Many evangelicals feel that their votes have been hijacked by the Republican party.  They feel that the Republican party has its own agenda separate from theirs.
  6. The War in Iraq is not popular even among evangelicals.  In the middle of the country where evangelicals are mostly located the reaction against the war took longer to grow, but nevertheless has.
  7. The Evangelical agenda has expanded from 2 issues-Abortion and Sanctity of Marriage to a whole host of issues from poverty to global warming.
  8. Many evangelicals are tired of the politics of James Dobson and are looking for a new alternative, and Obama is the new kid on the block talking about faith.

Conclusion
With all of this “new thinking” about politics going on among evangelicals, it is important that we keep clear heads about the issues that are facing the nation as it goes forward.  It is important to have a holistic agenda; however, it is also vital that Christians are able to see that not all issues are equal.  This requires an honest conversation concerning the most pressing issues of our time.

Share